Today, January 22, 2021, is a historic day. The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons enters into force, three months after the 50th country, Honduras, ratified it. Nuclear weapons are now illegal under international law in every aspect. Possession is illegal; manufacture is illegal; use is illegal; threatening to use is illegal; transfer is illegal; aiding and abetting any of these things is illegal.
I salute the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War, where the idea for this treaty originated — though its antecedents go much farther back — to the 1990s, when many non-government organizations, including IPPNW, created a mock treaty to ban nuclear weapons. The International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN) was formed to bring the idea to fruition; it won the Nobel Peace Prize for doing so.
It is a comprehensive treaty; no nuclear weapon states have signed it. There are nine: the United States, Russia (the successor nuclear state of the Soviet Union), Britain, France, China, Israel, India, Pakistan, and North Korea (though Israel does not confirm or deny possessing these weapons). The first five are parties to the 1970 Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, whose Article VI requires them to negotiate “in good faith” to achieve nuclear disarmament. In the 1990s, the World Court interpreted this to mean actually achieving nuclear disarmament in all its aspects. Both the good faith and the achievement have been sorely lacking.
Avoiding further humanitarian catastrophes that the manufacture, testing, and use of nuclear weapons have already created are at the heart of the treaty; so, of course, is preventing the true apocalypse of a nuclear war. Countless families since the first chain reaction was achieved at the University of Chicago on December 2, 1942 have suffered. IPPNW and IEER documented those disasters, so far as public information would allow, in three volumes published in the 1990s: Radioactive Heaven and Earth on testing; Plutonium Deadly Gold of the Nuclear Age; and Nuclear Wastelands (published by MIT Press). Health and environmental harm was at the center of the first nuclear weapons treaty — the 1963 treaty that banned nuclear testing in the atmosphere, undersea, and in space.
But much remains in obscurity. Radioactive waste problems continue to fester. The fact that uranium was mined in many non-nuclear weapons states, leaving behind ill-health and radioactive waste, has hardly registered on the global political scene. Nuclear testing was done largely on indigenous and colonial lands. At the 2014 conference in Vienna, one of three that led up to the treaty, I argued that every nuclear weapons state has first of all harmed its own people without informed consent. That fact remains almost as obscure as it was in July 1945, when the first nuclear weapons test lit the New Mexico sky with the most ominous light the world had seen to that point; worse was to come. Indeed, the families irradiated by the intense fallout from that “Trinity test” and their descendants, organized as the Tularosa Basin Downwinders Consortium, are still struggling for recognition and compensation.
In view of this history, it seems appropriate to ask the states parties to the TPNW to set up a Global Truth Commission on Nuclear Weapons under the auspices of the United Nations. Bringing to light the awful truths of the poisoning of the Earth and the lawlessness that has accompanied it (“A secret operation not subject to laws” one high U.S. government official said in 1989) may help being some justice to those who have suffered. At the same time, it may help mobilize the public in the nuclear weapons states and their allies — who live under a malignant “nuclear umbrella” whose use would destroy them and everyone else — to demand an end to something that has been immoral since its creation and is now also unequivocally illegal.
Thanks for all your work, which has pushed the world toward this important treaty, Arjun. Worthy work.
Comment by Peter Montague — January, 2021 @ 7:02 pm
Ive been doing my best for over 50 years to educate the public about NWs.Im a retired obstetrition The work of ICAN has given me renewed hope
Comment by Harry Cohen AM — January, 2021 @ 11:27 pm
Dear Dr Makhijani
Your dedication to informing the public, health care providers, and governments about the multiple hazards associated with nuclear weapons has lifted so many of us out of hopelessness and depression. It was my honor to work with Dr Rudi Nussbaum and PSR as the Oregon delegate to the Hanford Health Effects Subcommittee, 1995-2005.
Did you know that Rudi’s widow Laureen, now in her nineties, keeps up a worldwide correspondence? Another HHES delegate, Trisha Pritikin, published a book last year, “The Hanford Plaintiffs” which recounts some of devastating health effects testimony given before the HHES, and also supplies in a very readable fashion, some of the scientific support for health effect claims.
Please let me know if you would like current contact information for Trisha and Laureen.
Linda Keir
Comment by Linda Keir — January, 2021 @ 4:00 am
BAN ON NUCLEAR WEAPONS REASONING John A. McCabe Atomic Veteran
A first step to the dream of a ban on nuclear weapons would be the revelation of the truth regarding the two atomic bombs used on the children of Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
The two bombs did not end the war. The Japanese were already defeated – The Russians were going to invade and bring unwanted Communism to a beaten Japan. The Japanese were pursuing surrender. The Americans delayed the surrender by insisting on unconditional surrender which was abandoned when Truman conceded conditional surrender to the Japanese by allowing the Emperor to continue functioning as a leader figure in his desiccated office.
The two bombs did not save American forces from an invasion of Japan. The invasion plans were scrapped by Truman in July after the lessons on invasion tactics and failings of the Okinawa slaughter. Truman could not afford the political repercussions of invading a defeated nation of known fanaticism.
The two hideous and uncivilized, filthy bombs did not earn the justification of billions of dollars and years and years of recklessly building a nuclear arsenal, but the propaganda of their value to bad science and misdirected scientist, and doomsday militarists, and demented world leaders and the new world fear diplomacy, a psychotic form of psychological/nuclear warfare was nevertheless born and propagated. The nuclear weapons continued to be used to terrify populations even though they remained in the silos, and bombers submarines.
They not only killed and maimed thousands of children, they fused their burnt flesh turning fingers into claws, they melted eyes and blew them out of their sockets, they scorched their families their schools with surface temperatures in the thousands of degrees,
The so-called period of nonuse of nuclear weapons is a false deterrent, it prompted Russia to build bigger bombs than their advisories and kept the nuclear threat alive and exceedingly funded until the stockpile became absurd and beyond the level of world destruction.
All this deception against a logical ban of nuclear weapons and the resultant world careening in a vector that cannot otherwise be fixed has been initiated and sustained by the lies above.
The atomic bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was a matter of runaway, overly funded, reckless science and weapons development that ran counter to human purpose and true and pure intelligence.
Comment by john MCCABE — January, 2021 @ 9:27 am
There is indeed much evidence that the Japanese surrender had centrally to do with the fear of being occupied by the Soviets. And also that one principal motivation for the use of the bombs was to justify the enormous expenditures. It was also, as many historians have noted, about sending a message to the Soviets about the shape of the post-war world. We must not give a pass to the other powers. I explained my own view of the bombings and why I concluded they were not justified in a 2012 talk I gave in Santa Fe, NM: From Pearl Harbor to Hiroshima.
Comment by Arjun Makhijani, Ph.D — January, 2021 @ 1:37 pm
Dr Makhijani has devoted his scientific expertise over a lifetime to improving the public’s understanding of the technical, the health impacts, the history and the immorality of nuclear weapons. His science is true to the facts with which he deals and true to a humane utility and use for scientific knowledge.
By contrast, 40 miles from my home the business of designing and promoting new uses for nuclear weapons proceeds apace at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Hannah Arendt described the ‘banality of evil’when writing about the personalities of Nazi leaders on trial after WWII. Similarly at Los Alamos here in New Mexico there is never a whisper of shame at the genocidal implications of the lab’s profitable mission which is to perpetuate the possible horror of the use of nuclear weapons on our generation, or our posterity, not to mention swathes of what remains of Earth’s unique natural world and its inhabitants.
Broadly speaking the scientific impulse of our species serves both the beautiful and the corrupt in human curiosity: let Dr Makhijani’s scientific work, always done with a public good in mind, be a guiding and encouraging example for younger men and women seeking to enter on a scientific career.
Comment by Cathie Sullivan — January, 2021 @ 1:26 am
Arjun, This is wonderful! Good news, and a good blog post. You and Annie and countless others have worked very hard and very consistently on these problems for many decades. Thank you!
Comment by Madeline Sunley — February, 2021 @ 4:40 pm